Johnson v. Saam

Indiana Supreme Court

Johnson v. Saam

19 Ind. 146

DecidedNovember 15, 1862

StatusPublished

This text of 19 Ind. 146 (Johnson v. Saam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Saam, 19 Ind. 146 (Ind. 1862).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellant, who was the plaintiff, sued Charles Meyer and Frederick Saam for trespass quare clausum fregit. Proper issues having been made, the cause was submitted to a jury, who found for the defendants. Plaintiff moved for a new trial, on the single ground “ That the verdict was unsustained by the evidence.” The evidence is upon the record. We have examined it carefully, and are of opinion, though it is, to some extent, conflicting, that the weight of it accords with the verdict.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appellant, who was the plaintiff, sued Charles Meyer and Frederick Saam for trespass quare clausum fregit. Proper issues having been made, the cause was submitted to a jury, who found for the defendants. Plaintiff moved for a new trial, on the single ground “ That the verdict was unsustained by the evidence.” The evidence is upon the record. We have examined it carefully, and are of opinion, though it is, to some extent, conflicting, that the weight of it accords with the verdict.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 Ind. 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-saam-ind-1862.