Johnson v. Roberts

1925 OK 699, 239 P. 578, 113 Okla. 116, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 915
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. Roberts. Read the opinion of the Court — 124 Okla. 68
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided September 15, 1925·No. 16390·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Palo A. Roberts and James Hudspeth sued plaintiff in error, Mary J. Johnson, in the district court of Atoka county, and garnished the Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company and the Mid-Continent Life Insurance Company. Judgment was rendered against plaintiff in error and the garnishees. The garnishees paid the judgment into court and were discharged, and they now move the dismissal «f the appeal.. The garnishees having lully discharged their obligation, the only questn n that remains to be determined is the question of who is entitled to receive the money, a matter in which they have no concern. We cannot see wherein they are necessary parties to the appeal, and the same is dismissed as to them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Roberts, 1925 OK 699, 239 P. 578, 113 Okla. 116, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 915 (Okla. 1925).

1925 OK 699 (Johnson v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.