Johnson v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Johnson v. Roberts

1925 OK 699, 239 P. 578, 113 Okla. 116, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 915

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 15, 1925

Docket16390

StatusPublished

This text of 1925 OK 699 (Johnson v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Roberts, 1925 OK 699, 239 P. 578, 113 Okla. 116, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 915 (Okla. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Palo A. Roberts and James Hudspeth sued plaintiff in error, Mary J. Johnson, in the district court of Atoka county, and garnished the Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company and the Mid-Continent Life Insurance Company. Judgment was rendered against plaintiff in error and the garnishees. The garnishees paid the judgment into court and were discharged, and they now move the dismissal «f the appeal.. The garnishees having lully discharged their obligation, the only questn n that remains to be determined is the question of who is entitled to receive the money, a matter in which they have no concern. We cannot see wherein they are necessary parties to the appeal, and the same is dismissed as to them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Palo A. Roberts and James Hudspeth sued plaintiff in error, Mary J. Johnson, in the district court of Atoka county, and garnished the Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company and the Mid-Continent Life Insurance Company. Judgment was rendered against plaintiff in error and the garnishees. The garnishees paid the judgment into court and were discharged, and they now move the dismissal «f the appeal.. The garnishees having lully discharged their obligation, the only questn n that remains to be determined is the question of who is entitled to receive the money, a matter in which they have no concern. We cannot see wherein they are necessary parties to the appeal, and the same is dismissed as to them.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1925 OK 699, 239 P. 578, 113 Okla. 116, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-roberts-okla-1925.