Johnson v. Rivara

169 A. 691, 112 N.J.L. 92, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 232
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 5, 1934·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None. *Page 93

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Rivara, 169 A. 691, 112 N.J.L. 92, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 232 (N.J. 1934).

169 A. 691 (Johnson v. Rivara) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Paradiso v. Mazejy
69 A.2d 15 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1949)