Johnson v. Rental Uniform Service of Greenville, S.C., Inc.

447 S.E.2d 184, 316 S.C. 70, 1994 S.C. LEXIS 142
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided June 20, 1994·No. 24099·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

After careful consideration, we decline to adopt the “dual capacity” doctrine as the law of South Carolina. See Parker v. Williams and Madjanik, Inc., 275 S.C. 65, 267 S.E. (2d) 524 (1980); 2A Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law §§ 72:80; 72:81(C) (1993). Accordingly, the circuit court order is affirmed.

/s/ David W. Harwell C.J. /s/ A. Lee Chandler A.J. Is/ Ernest A. Finnev. Jr. A.J. /s/ Jean H. Toal A.J. /s/ James E. Moore A.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Rental Uniform Service of Greenville, S.C., Inc., 447 S.E.2d 184, 316 S.C. 70, 1994 S.C. LEXIS 142 (S.C. 1994).

447 S.E.2d 184 (Johnson v. Rental Uniform Service of Greenville, S.C., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mendenall v. Anderson Hardwood Floors, LLC
738 S.E.2d 251 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2013)
Tatum v. Medical University of South Carolina
552 S.E.2d 18 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2001)
Tatum v. Medical University of South Carolina
517 S.E.2d 706 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1999)