Johnson v. Rental Uniform Service of Greenville, S.C., Inc.
447 S.E.2d 184, 316 S.C. 70, 1994 S.C. LEXIS 142
This text of 447 S.E.2d 184 (Johnson v. Rental Uniform Service of Greenville, S.C., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Johnson v. Rental Uniform Service of Greenville, S.C., Inc., 447 S.E.2d 184, 316 S.C. 70, 1994 S.C. LEXIS 142 (S.C. 1994).
Opinion
After careful consideration, we decline to adopt the “dual capacity” doctrine as the law of South Carolina. See Parker v. Williams and Madjanik, Inc., 275 S.C. 65, 267 S.E. (2d) 524 (1980); 2A Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law §§ 72:80; 72:81(C) (1993). Accordingly, the circuit court order is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mendenall v. Anderson Hardwood Floors, LLC
738 S.E.2d 251 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2013)
Tatum v. Medical University of South Carolina
552 S.E.2d 18 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2001)
Tatum v. Medical University of South Carolina
517 S.E.2d 706 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1999)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
447 S.E.2d 184, 316 S.C. 70, 1994 S.C. LEXIS 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-rental-uniform-service-of-greenville-sc-inc-sc-1994.