Johnson v. Rental Uniform Service of Greenville, S.C., Inc.
447 S.E.2d 184, 316 S.C. 70, 1994 S.C. LEXIS 142
Opinion
After careful consideration, we decline to adopt the “dual capacity” doctrine as the law of South Carolina. See Parker v. Williams and Madjanik, Inc., 275 S.C. 65, 267 S.E. (2d) 524 (1980); 2A Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law §§ 72:80; 72:81(C) (1993). Accordingly, the circuit court order is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. Rental Uniform Service of Greenville, S.C., Inc., 447 S.E.2d 184, 316 S.C. 70, 1994 S.C. LEXIS 142 (S.C. 1994).
447 S.E.2d 184 (Johnson v. Rental Uniform Service of Greenville, S.C., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mendenall v. Anderson Hardwood Floors, LLC
738 S.E.2d 251 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2013)
Tatum v. Medical University of South Carolina
552 S.E.2d 18 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2001)
Tatum v. Medical University of South Carolina
517 S.E.2d 706 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1999)