Johnson v. Rand

Superior Court of New Hampshire

Johnson v. Rand

6 N.H. 22

DecidedMay 15, 1832

StatusPublished

This text of 6 N.H. 22 (Johnson v. Rand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Rand, 6 N.H. 22 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1832).

Pincite

Opinion

By the court.

The only question which this case presents, is, whether the defendant had a right to change the mode, in which he used the water, for the purposes of his mill, provided he took no more water than was necessary to work the mill, before he made the changes r This question has long been settled, and we think that the direction, to the jury, was as favorable to the plaintiffs, as the law will warrant. 1 B. & A. 258, Saunders v. Newman; 2 N. H. Rep. 255, Bullen v. Runnels; 4 Coke, 86, Luttrel's case; 5 Taunton, 454, Alder v. Lavil.

Judgment on the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the court.

The only question which this case presents, is, whether the defendant had a right to change the mode, in which he used the water, for the purposes of his mill, provided he took no more water than was necessary to work the mill, before he made the changes r This question has long been settled, and we think that the direction, to the jury, was as favorable to the plaintiffs, as the law will warrant. 1 B. & A. 258, Saunders v. Newman; 2 N. H. Rep. 255, Bullen v. Runnels; 4 Coke, 86, Luttrel's case; 5 Taunton, 454, Alder v. Lavil.

Judgment on the verdict.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 N.H. 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-rand-nhsuperct-1832.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack