Johnson v. Raboff
This text of 188 A.D.2d 517 (Johnson v. Raboff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action, inter alia, for an accounting, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), entered September 21, 1990, as denied those branches of their motion which were to dismiss the second, third, fourth, fifth, and sixth affirmative defenses and the first, second, third, fifth, sixth, and seventh counterclaims.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiffs’ contentions are without merit (see, CPLR 3013, 3024 [a]; Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C3013:7). Lawrence, J. P., Miller, O’Brien and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
188 A.D.2d 517, 591 N.Y.S.2d 348, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-raboff-nyappdiv-1992.