Johnson v. Queens-Long Island Medical Group, P.C.

17 A.D.3d 407, 792 N.Y.S.2d 336, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3886

This text of 17 A.D.3d 407 (Johnson v. Queens-Long Island Medical Group, P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Queens-Long Island Medical Group, P.C., 17 A.D.3d 407, 792 N.Y.S.2d 336, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for medical mal[408]*408practice and wrongful death, the defendants Queens-Long Island Medical Group, P.C., Charles Walker, and Michael Rosenfeld appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), dated May 26, 2004, which, upon converting the motion of the defendants Charles Walker and Michael Rosenfeld to one for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, denied the motion.

Ordered that the appeal by the defendant Queens-Long Island Medical Group, EC., is dismissed, as it is not aggrieved by the order appealed from (see CPLR 5511); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the defendants Charles Walker and Michael Rosenfeld, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendants Charles Walker and Michael Rosenfeld.

The complaint was time-barred insofar as asserted against the defendants Charles Walker and Michael Rosenfeld. These defendants established, as a matter of law, the inapplicability of the continuous treatment toll of the statute of limitations (see CPLR 214-a; Nykorchuck v Henriques, 78 NY2d 255, 259 [1991]; McDermott v Torre, 56 NY2d 399 [1982]; Couch v County of Suffolk, 296 AD2d 194 [2002]). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

Since the statute of limitations had run as to the defendants Walker and Rosenfeld, their motion, converted to one for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, should have been granted. Adams, J.P., Krausman, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McDermott v. Torre
437 N.E.2d 1108 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
Nykorchuck v. Henriques
577 N.E.2d 1026 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)
Couch v. County of Suffolk
296 A.D.2d 194 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 A.D.3d 407, 792 N.Y.S.2d 336, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-queens-long-island-medical-group-pc-nyappdiv-2005.