Johnson v. Prosperity Mortgage Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Johnson v. Prosperity Mortgage Corp.

503 F. App'x 198

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 4, 2013

DocketNo. 11-2324

StatusPublished

This text of 503 F. App'x 198 (Johnson v. Prosperity Mortgage Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Prosperity Mortgage Corp., 503 F. App'x 198 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alexander A. Johnson appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his complaint in which he sought a judgment quieting title to real property, a declaratory judgment, and an accounting. The district court determined that Johnson’s complaint failed to state a claim for relief. We have reviewed the record and the briefs submitted on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Prosperity Mortg. Corp., No. 8:ll-cv-02532-AW, 2011 WL 5513231 (D.Md. Nov. 3, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alexander A. Johnson appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his complaint in which he sought a judgment quieting title to real property, a declaratory judgment, and an accounting. The district court determined that Johnson’s complaint failed to state a claim for relief. We have reviewed the record and the briefs submitted on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Prosperity Mortg. Corp., No. 8:ll-cv-02532-AW, 2011 WL 5513231 (D.Md. Nov. 3, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

503 F. App'x 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-prosperity-mortgage-corp-ca4-2013.