Johnson v. Prine
This text of 55 Ind. 351 (Johnson v. Prine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Prine sued Johnson on a promissory note, which did not waive the benefit of the appraisement laws. Answer; reply; trial by the court; finding for Prine; motion for a new trial; overruled; exceptions; judgment; appeal.
The court rendered judgment in favor of Prine, for the amount found due, “ and that he have execution without relief from valuation laws of Indiana.” This was erro[352]*352neous; but as tbe evidence is not before us, and as Johnson did not object to the form of the judgment, and did not reserve any exceptions to its rendition, nor ask relict below, he can not present the question here. Smith v. Dodds, 35 Ind. 452; Atkisson v. Martin, 39 Ind. 242; Lewis v, Edwards, 44 Ind. 333.
This is the only question discussed in the appellant’s brief.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Petition for a rehearing overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
55 Ind. 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-prine-ind-1876.