Johnson v. Prine

55 Ind. 351
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1876·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Biddle, J.

Prine sued Johnson on a promissory note, which did not waive the benefit of the appraisement laws. Answer; reply; trial by the court; finding for Prine; motion for a new trial; overruled; exceptions; judgment; appeal.

The court rendered judgment in favor of Prine, for the amount found due, “ and that he have execution without relief from valuation laws of Indiana.” This was erro[352] neous; but as tbe evidence is not before us, and as Johnson did not object to the form of the judgment, and did not reserve any exceptions to its rendition, nor ask relict below, he can not present the question here. Smith v. Dodds, 35 Ind. 452; Atkisson v. Martin, 39 Ind. 242; Lewis v, Edwards, 44 Ind. 333.

This is the only question discussed in the appellant’s brief.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Petition for a rehearing overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Prine, 55 Ind. 351 (Ind. 1876).

55 Ind. 351 (Johnson v. Prine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kreitlein v. Ferger
97 N.E. 819 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1912)
Cauthorn v. Bierhaus
88 N.E. 314 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1909)
State ex rel. Lowe v. Tow
31 N.E. 1120 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1892)
Midland Railway Co. v. Dickason
29 N.E. 775 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1892)
American Insurance v. Gibson
3 N.E. 892 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1885)
Powers v. Johnson
86 Ind. 298 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1882)
Smith v. Tatman
71 Ind. 171 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1880)
Ludlow v. Walker
67 Ind. 353 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1879)