Johnson v. Prescott

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Johnson v. Prescott

43 A. 1075, 67 N.H. 597

DecidedJune 5, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 43 A. 1075 (Johnson v. Prescott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Prescott, 43 A. 1075, 67 N.H. 597 (N.H. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Trespass, q. cl. Verdict for the defendant. The boundary line between the parties and the location of a corner were in dispute. A witness called by the defendant was permitted to testify, subject to exception, that on a survey of the line made by him the plaintiff’s brother was present and did not object to his taking the corner to be at the place where the defendant claimed it to be, and for this cause the verdict was set aside.

Blodgett, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trespass, q. cl. Verdict for the defendant. The boundary line between the parties and the location of a corner were in dispute. A witness called by the defendant was permitted to testify, subject to exception, that on a survey of the line made by him the plaintiff’s brother was present and did not object to his taking the corner to be at the place where the defendant claimed it to be, and for this cause the verdict was set aside.

Blodgett, J., did not sit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 A. 1075, 67 N.H. 597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-prescott-nh-1893.