Johnson v. Port City Janitors' Supply & Paper Co.
This text of 333 F. App'x 145 (Johnson v. Port City Janitors' Supply & Paper Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
David Johnson appeals following the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment-discrimination action and the court’s ensuing denial of his motion for reconsideration. After careful de novo review, see Davis v. KARK-TV, Inc., 421 F.3d 699, 703 (8th Cir.2005), we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court; and we also conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying reconsideration, see McAninch v. Wintermute, 491 F.3d 759, 775 (8th Cir.2007). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
333 F. App'x 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-port-city-janitors-supply-paper-co-ca8-2009.