Johnson v. Port City Janitors' Supply & Paper Co.

Eighth Circuit

Johnson v. Port City Janitors' Supply & Paper Co.

333 F. App'x 145

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided October 8, 2009·No. 08-2847·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David Johnson appeals following the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment-discrimination action and the court’s ensuing denial of his motion for reconsideration. After careful de novo review, see Davis v. KARK-TV, Inc., 421 F.3d 699, 703 (8th Cir.2005), we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court; and we also conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying reconsideration, see McAninch v. Wintermute, 491 F.3d 759, 775 (8th Cir.2007). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

David Johnson appeals following the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment-discrimination action and the court’s ensuing denial of his motion for reconsideration. After careful de novo review, see Davis v. KARK-TV, Inc., 421 F.3d 699, 703 (8th Cir.2005), we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court; and we also conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying reconsideration, see McAninch v. Wintermute, 491 F.3d 759, 775 (8th Cir.2007). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Johnson v. Port City Janitors' Supply & Paper Co., 333 F. App'x 145 (8th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

333 F. App'x 145 (Johnson v. Port City Janitors' Supply & Paper Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related