Johnson v. Pope

637 F. App'x 106
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 8, 2016
DocketNo. 15-1992
StatusPublished

This text of 637 F. App'x 106 (Johnson v. Pope) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Pope, 637 F. App'x 106 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Brad R. Johnson and Elci Wijayaningsih appeal the district court’s order and judgment granting summary judgment to the Appellees and dismissing their 26 U.S.C. § 7422 (2012) action seeking to recover an alleged overpayment of taxes. We have reviewed the record and find- no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Pope, No. 7:13-cv-00078-BO (E.D.N.C. July 31, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Civil actions for refund
26 U.S.C. § 7422

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
637 F. App'x 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-pope-ca4-2016.