Johnson v. Pope

Fourth Circuit

Johnson v. Pope

637 F. App'x 106

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 8, 2016·No. No. 15-1992·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Brad R. Johnson and Elci Wijayaningsih appeal the district court’s order and judgment granting summary judgment to the Appellees and dismissing their 26 U.S.C. § 7422 (2012) action seeking to recover an alleged overpayment of taxes. We have reviewed the record and find- no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Pope, No. 7:13-cv-00078-BO (E.D.N.C. July 31, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Brad R. Johnson and Elci Wijayaningsih appeal the district court’s order and judgment granting summary judgment to the Appellees and dismissing their 26 U.S.C. § 7422 (2012) action seeking to recover an alleged overpayment of taxes. We have reviewed the record and find- no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Pope, No. 7:13-cv-00078-BO (E.D.N.C. July 31, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Johnson v. Pope, 637 F. App'x 106 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

637 F. App'x 106 (Johnson v. Pope) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related