Johnson v. Police Department

178 A.D.2d 643, 578 N.Y.S.2d 218, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16902
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 30, 1991
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 178 A.D.2d 643 (Johnson v. Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Police Department, 178 A.D.2d 643, 578 N.Y.S.2d 218, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16902 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Police Department of the City of New York, dated June 5, 1991, which, after a hearing, determined the petitioner’s business to be a public nuisance and directed its closure for a period of one year, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Spodek, J.), dated July 24, 1991, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Despite the petitioner’s contentions, we find that the respondent’s determination was supported by substantial evidence and was neither arbitrary nor capricious. The evidence of four arrests for gambling violations in the petitioner’s place of business from December 1990 to April 1991, one of which resulted in a criminal conviction, supports the respondent’s determination that the petitioner’s place of business was a [644]*644public nuisance (see, Administrative Code of City of New York § 10-155 [b]). Upon such a determination, the respondent is authorized to close the petitioner’s place of business to the extent necessary to abate the nuisance (see, Administrative Code § 10-156).

Despite the petitioner’s argument that he has made efforts to separate the area of premises where the illegal gambling violations occurred from the area of the premises which serves as a "legitimate” video rental store, it is clear that the petitioner still has legal as well as physical access to the area of the premises where the gambling violations occurred. Thus, the petitioner’s argument that the video store should be allowed to remain open as a separate entity is without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Lawrence, Rosenblatt and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Westside Grocery & Deli, LLC v. City of Syracuse
211 A.D.3d 1551 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Matter of J-Bon, LLC v. City of Syracuse
2020 NY Slip Op 07813 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 A.D.2d 643, 578 N.Y.S.2d 218, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-police-department-nyappdiv-1991.