Johnson v. Phipps

Fourth Circuit

Johnson v. Phipps

384 F. App'x 198

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 16, 2010·No. No. 09-6647·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Johnson appeals the district court’s orders entered in accordance with the jury’s verdict and denying his post-judgment motions in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motions for a writ of habeas corpus, for release pending appeal, to grant in forma pauperis status free of the terms of the [200]*200PLRA, and to extend filing time are denied.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Johnson appeals the district court’s orders entered in accordance with the jury’s verdict and denying his post-judgment motions in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motions for a writ of habeas corpus, for release pending appeal, to grant in forma pauperis status free of the terms of the [200]*200PLRA, and to extend filing time are denied.

AFFIRMED.

Johnson v. Phipps, 384 F. App'x 198 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

384 F. App'x 198 (Johnson v. Phipps) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related