Johnson v. Phelan Hallinan & Schmieg, LLP

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Johnson v. Phelan Hallinan & Schmieg, LLP

212 A.3d 499

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 30, 2019

DocketNo. 11 WAL 2019

StatusPublished

This text of 212 A.3d 499 (Johnson v. Phelan Hallinan & Schmieg, LLP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Phelan Hallinan & Schmieg, LLP, 212 A.3d 499 (Pa. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity is:

Did the Superior Court err in determining the mortgage at issue was not a "residential mortgage" and that petitioners are therefore not entitled to seek damages pursuant to 41 P.S. §§ 406 and 502?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity is:

Did the Superior Court err in determining the mortgage at issue was not a "residential mortgage" and that petitioners are therefore not entitled to seek damages pursuant to 41 P.S. §§ 406 and 502?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 A.3d 499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-phelan-hallinan-schmieg-llp-pa-2019.