Johnson v. Perry
This text of 121 Ga. 68 (Johnson v. Perry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Even if the principal sum or damages claimed in the suit in the county court did not exceed fifty dollars, this was no cause for dismissing the suit when on appeal in the superior court. The motion should have been to dismiss the appeal.
2. A ground of a motion for a new trial assigning error upon the admission of evidence will not be considered, unless the evidence is set forth in such manner that the question of its admissibility can be decided without reference to other parts of the record.
3. There was evidence to authorize the verdict, except as to the specific amount the judge, on the hearing of the motion for a new trial, ordered written off. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
121 Ga. 68, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-perry-ga-1901.