Johnson v. Perales

198 A.D.2d 795, 605 N.Y.S.2d 1015

Opinion

—Determination unanimously annulled on the law without costs and petition granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: Respondents’ determination that petitioner was not entitled to supportive services in connection with his attendance at community college is not supported by substantial evidence (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State [796]*796Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176). Petitioner was entitled to such supportive services "to enable [him] * * * to develop an employability plan and to enable [him] to accept employment or participate in education, training and employment activities under the JOBS program” (18 NYCRR 385.3 [a] [1]). (Article 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Rosenbloom, J.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Fallon, Boomer and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Perales, 198 A.D.2d 795, 605 N.Y.S.2d 1015 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

198 A.D.2d 795 (Johnson v. Perales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human Rights
379 N.E.2d 1183 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)