Johnson v. Perales

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Johnson v. Perales

198 A.D.2d 795, 605 N.Y.S.2d 1015

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 19, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 198 A.D.2d 795 (Johnson v. Perales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Perales, 198 A.D.2d 795, 605 N.Y.S.2d 1015 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Determination unanimously annulled on the law without costs and petition granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: Respondents’ determination that petitioner was not entitled to supportive services in connection with his attendance at community college is not supported by substantial evidence (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State [796]*796Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176). Petitioner was entitled to such supportive services "to enable [him] * * * to develop an employability plan and to enable [him] to accept employment or participate in education, training and employment activities under the JOBS program” (18 NYCRR 385.3 [a] [1]). (Article 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Rosenbloom, J.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Fallon, Boomer and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Determination unanimously annulled on the law without costs and petition granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: Respondents’ determination that petitioner was not entitled to supportive services in connection with his attendance at community college is not supported by substantial evidence (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State [796]*796Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176). Petitioner was entitled to such supportive services "to enable [him] * * * to develop an employability plan and to enable [him] to accept employment or participate in education, training and employment activities under the JOBS program” (18 NYCRR 385.3 [a] [1]). (Article 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Rosenbloom, J.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Fallon, Boomer and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 A.D.2d 795, 605 N.Y.S.2d 1015, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-perales-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack