Johnson v. Pep Boys—Manny

Fourth Circuit

Johnson v. Pep Boys—Manny

70 F. App'x 697

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 23, 2003·No. No. 02-2258·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin A. Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action on res judicata and statute of limitations grounds. We have independently reviewed the record and find no error in the district court’s dismissal. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Johnson v. Pep Boys, No. CA-02-381-2 (E.D.Va. Oct. 23, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin A. Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action on res judicata and statute of limitations grounds. We have independently reviewed the record and find no error in the district court’s dismissal. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Johnson v. Pep Boys, No. CA-02-381-2 (E.D.Va. Oct. 23, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Johnson v. Pep Boys—Manny, 70 F. App'x 697 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

70 F. App'x 697 (Johnson v. Pep Boys—Manny) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.