Johnson v. Pep Boys

Fourth Circuit

Johnson v. Pep Boys

164 F. App'x 385

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 30, 2006·No. No. 05-1612·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin A. Johnson appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motions to dismiss Johnson’s civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Johnson v. Pep Boys, No. CA-04-632-2 (E.D.Va. Jun. 14, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin A. Johnson appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motions to dismiss Johnson’s civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Johnson v. Pep Boys, No. CA-04-632-2 (E.D.Va. Jun. 14, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Johnson v. Pep Boys, 164 F. App'x 385 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

164 F. App'x 385 (Johnson v. Pep Boys) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.