Johnson v. Pendleton

1 Cal. 132
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJune 15, 1850
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 Cal. 132 (Johnson v. Pendleton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Pendleton, 1 Cal. 132 (Cal. 1850).

Opinion

By the Court,

Bennett, J.

The plaintiff’s action is for services as clerk in a store. The defendants deny that they are indebted to the plaintiff, but claim that he is indebted to them. This is the substance of the pleadings. The cause was tried before a jury, and judgment rendered, upon their verdict, for $479,47 in favor of the plaintiff. The defendants appeal. At the trial the testimony was conflicting; no point of law was ruled against the defendants ; and they seem to have appealed solely upon the ground that the jury came to an incorrect conclusion upon a matter of fact. We have already held, in several cases, that we ought not to disturb the verdict of a jury upon a question of fact, where the evidence is conflicting, and where no rule of law appears to have been violated. These decisions control this case.

Judgment affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kerns v. Dean
6 P. 704 (California Supreme Court, 1885)
Bernard v. Raglan
1 Cal. Unrep. 17 (California Supreme Court, 1856)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Cal. 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-pendleton-cal-1850.