Johnson v. Parmely

17 Johns. 271
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1820
StatusPublished

This text of 17 Johns. 271 (Johnson v. Parmely) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Parmely, 17 Johns. 271 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1820).

Opinion

Per Curiara.

It is a settled principle, that wherever there is a change of parties, by marriage, bankruptcy, or death, whereby other persons become interested in the execution of the judgment, a scire facias is necessary so as to make such new person a party to the judgment. (Tidd’s Practice, 1021.) Here the husband will be benefited by the execution of the judgment, and has, by the marriage, acquired an interest in it The execution must be set aside for irregularity, with costs.

Rule accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 Johns. 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-parmely-nysupct-1820.