Johnson v. Paraplane Corporation
This text of 468 S.E.2d 620 (Johnson v. Paraplane Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in Johnson v. Paraplane Corporation, — S.C. —, 460 S.E. (2d) 398 (Ct. App. 1995). We grant the petition for a writ of certiorari, vacate the opinion of the Court of Appeals, and dismiss both parties’ appeals.
Petitioner and respondent appealed from the order of the circuit court denying respondents’ motion for summary judgment, finding that the circuit court had subject matter jurisdiction, and compelling arbitration. Since this order is not directly appealable, 1 we hereby vacate the opinion of the Court of Appeals in Johnson v. Paraplane Corporation, supra, and dismiss both parties’ appeals. No costs or attorneys’ fees pursuant to Rule 222, SCACR, shall be assessed.
Vacated.
Woodard v. Westvaco Corporation, — S.C. —, 460 S.E. (2d) 392 (1996) (an order which determines a question of subject matter jurisdiction is not immediately appealable); Heffner v. Destiny, S.C. Sup. Ct. Order dated June 28, 1995 (Davis Adv. Sh. No. 19) (an order compelling arbitration is not immediately appealable); Ballenger v. Bowen, 313 S.C. 476, 443 S.E. (2d) 379 (1994) (an order denying a motion for summary judgment is not immediately appealable).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
468 S.E.2d 620, 321 S.C. 316, 1996 S.C. LEXIS 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-paraplane-corporation-sc-1996.