Johnson v. PAMELA PRYOR-DEMBE OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY COMMON PLEAS COURT

30 A.3d 1102, 612 Pa. 316, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 2554
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 24, 2011·No. 68 EM 2011·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2011, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453 (1994) (hybrid representation not permitted). The Prothonotary is directed to forward the filings to counsel of record. Additionally, the Prothonotary is directed to strike the jurist’s name from the caption.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. PAMELA PRYOR-DEMBE OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY COMMON PLEAS COURT, 30 A.3d 1102, 612 Pa. 316, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 2554 (Pa. 2011).

30 A.3d 1102 (Johnson v. PAMELA PRYOR-DEMBE OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY COMMON PLEAS COURT) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Reid
642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)