Johnson v. Palmer
This text of 229 A.D. 813 (Johnson v. Palmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the action of Johnson v. Palmer: Judgment reversed on the law on the authority of Judson v. Fielding (227 App. Div. 430; affd., 253 N. Y. 596) and new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. In the action of Johnson v. Slater: Judgment reversed on the law on the authority of Judson v. Fielding (227 App. Div. 430; affd., 253 N. Y. -) and on the ground that there was a question of fact as to the negligence of the defendant and contributory negligence of the plaintiff; and new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Hinman, Acting P. J., Davis, Whitmyer, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
229 A.D. 813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-palmer-nyappdiv-1930.