Johnson v. Orange County

Fourth Circuit

Johnson v. Orange County

478 F. App'x 769

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 14, 2012·No. No. 12-7123·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Darnell Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Johnson’s motion for trial and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Orange Cnty., Va., No. 7:12-cv-00259-NKM-RSB, 2012 WL 2236631 (WD.Va. June 15, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Darnell Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Johnson’s motion for trial and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Orange Cnty., Va., No. 7:12-cv-00259-NKM-RSB, 2012 WL 2236631 (WD.Va. June 15, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Johnson v. Orange County, 478 F. App'x 769 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

478 F. App'x 769 (Johnson v. Orange County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related