Johnson v. Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

471 F. App'x 209
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 25, 2012
DocketNo. 12-1048
StatusPublished

This text of 471 F. App'x 209 (Johnson v. Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., 471 F. App'x 209 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Raymond A. Johnson appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate [210]*210judge’s report and recommendation and granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Finding no reversible error, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Ogletree, No. 3:11-cv-00391-MOC-DCK, 2011 WL 5970914 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 28, 2011). Johnson claims on appeal that the district court was biased against him. Our review of the record has revealed no evidence of extra-judicial bias, and therefore this argument is without merit. See Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540, 555, 114 S.Ct. 1147, 127 L.Ed.2d 474 (1994) (holding that unfavorable judicial rulings alone do not constitute bias). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Liteky v. United States
510 U.S. 540 (Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
471 F. App'x 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-ogletree-deakins-nash-smoak-stewart-pc-ca4-2012.