Johnson v. Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
This text of 471 F. App'x 209 (Johnson v. Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Raymond A. Johnson appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate [210]*210judge’s report and recommendation and granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Finding no reversible error, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Ogletree, No. 3:11-cv-00391-MOC-DCK, 2011 WL 5970914 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 28, 2011). Johnson claims on appeal that the district court was biased against him. Our review of the record has revealed no evidence of extra-judicial bias, and therefore this argument is without merit. See Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540, 555, 114 S.Ct. 1147, 127 L.Ed.2d 474 (1994) (holding that unfavorable judicial rulings alone do not constitute bias). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
471 F. App'x 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-ogletree-deakins-nash-smoak-stewart-pc-ca4-2012.