Johnson v. Office of Personnel Management

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. Office of Personnel Management. Read the opinion of the Court — 257 F. App'x 314
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided October 15, 2008·No. 2008-3146·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-3146

KATHERINE S. JOHNSON,

Petitioner,

v.

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT,

Respondent.

Charles E. Samuels, Samuels Law Firm, of Richmond, Virginia, argued for petitioner.

David A. Harrington, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. On the brief were Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Donald E. Kinner, Assistant Director. Of counsel was Marla T. Conneely, Attorney; and Jo Ann Chabot, Office of Personnel Management, of Washington, DC.

Appealed from: Merit Systems Protection Board NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Judgment

ON APPEAL from the MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD

in CASE NO(S). DC844E070415-I-1

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (LOURIE, RADER, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATE: October 15, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly___________________ Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Office of Personnel Management, (Fed. Cir. 2008).

Johnson v. Office of Personnel Management (Johnson v. Office of Personnel Management) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.