Johnson v. North Carolina Prisoner Legal Services, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Johnson v. North Carolina Prisoner Legal Services, Inc.

23 F. App'x 179

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 11, 2002·No. No. 01-7488·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Wayne T. Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. North Carolina Prisoner Legal Servs., Inc., No. CA-01-508-CT (E.D.N.C. Aug. 21, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the [180] materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Wayne T. Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. North Carolina Prisoner Legal Servs., Inc., No. CA-01-508-CT (E.D.N.C. Aug. 21, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the [180] materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Johnson v. North Carolina Prisoner Legal Services, Inc., 23 F. App'x 179 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

23 F. App'x 179 (Johnson v. North Carolina Prisoner Legal Services, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related