Johnson v. Next Day Blinds Corp.
This text of 548 F. App'x 82 (Johnson v. Next Day Blinds Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Roger A. Johnson, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his employment discrimination action and denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Next Day Blinds Corp., No. 1:09-cv-02069-WMN, 2012 WL 2871418 (D.Md. Nov. 1, 2012; Feb 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
548 F. App'x 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-next-day-blinds-corp-ca4-2013.