Johnson v. Newman

186 A.D.2d 1046, 590 N.Y.S.2d 778, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11647

This text of 186 A.D.2d 1046 (Johnson v. Newman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Newman, 186 A.D.2d 1046, 590 N.Y.S.2d 778, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11647 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in excusing defendant’s delay in answering plaintiffs complaint and in granting defendant’s cross motion to extend the time for defendant to interpose an answer to the complaint. Further, Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiffs motion for a default judgment and an inquest on the amount of damages. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Hayes, J. — Default Judgment.) Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Boehm, Fallon and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 A.D.2d 1046, 590 N.Y.S.2d 778, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-newman-nyappdiv-1992.