Johnson v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Johnson v. New York City Transit Authority

280 A.D.2d 648, 720 N.Y.S.2d 845, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1859

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 26, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 280 A.D.2d 648 (Johnson v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. New York City Transit Authority, 280 A.D.2d 648, 720 N.Y.S.2d 845, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1859 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant New York City Transit Authority appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated January 7, 2000, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

In opposition to the prima facie showing by the defendant New York City Transit Authority (hereinafter the Transit Authority) of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiff and the defendant City of New York raised an issue of fact as to which defendant was responsible for maintaining the area where the plaintiff allegedly fell and sustained injuries. The motion by the Transit Authority was thus properly denied. Santucci, J. P., Altman, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant New York City Transit Authority appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated January 7, 2000, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

In opposition to the prima facie showing by the defendant New York City Transit Authority (hereinafter the Transit Authority) of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiff and the defendant City of New York raised an issue of fact as to which defendant was responsible for maintaining the area where the plaintiff allegedly fell and sustained injuries. The motion by the Transit Authority was thus properly denied. Santucci, J. P., Altman, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 A.D.2d 648, 720 N.Y.S.2d 845, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-2001.