Johnson v. Nelson
This text of 105 Okla. 296 (Johnson v. Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion hy
Plaintiffs in error have filed motion to dismiss the appeal in the above cause on the) ground that Leonard D. Ingram, the minor, has reached his majority since the appeal was lodged in this court, and since the question involved was the right of the guardian appointed in Washington, D. G., to remove moneys of the minor from the jurisdiction of the court and the custody of his guardians in this stat^, and this question being settled by the majority of the minor the same is moot in this! court.
We think this is correct, the motion should be sustained and the appeal should be dismissed, at the cost of the plaintiffs in error.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
105 Okla. 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-nelson-okla-1925.