Johnson v. Nelson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Johnson v. Nelson

104 N.W. 1150, 96 Minn. 534, 1905 Minn. LEXIS 594

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedNovember 24, 1905

DocketNos. 14,542—(124)

StatusPublished

This text of 104 N.W. 1150 (Johnson v. Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Nelson, 104 N.W. 1150, 96 Minn. 534, 1905 Minn. LEXIS 594 (Mich. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff brought an action to specifically perform a .written contract to convey land. The court found, as matters of fact, the execution of the contract in writing between the plaintiff and defendant, repeated tenders of payment or other equivalent by plaintiff under the agreement, and the amount due the defendant under the contract, and as a conclusion of law granted the plaintiff the relief he sought, upon proper conditions. It found against the defendant as to his claims' of abandonment and relinquishment of plaintiff’s right under the contract and as to the improvements made by defendant in reliance thereon. There is no point of law in the case deserving of consideration. The court could have made no other findings of fact upon the evidence. The abandonment, relinquishment, and improvements consisted of unjustified trespasses by the defendant. The defendant’s contentions contain nothing of general interest or importance, and in themselves do not call for discussion.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff brought an action to specifically perform a .written contract to convey land. The court found, as matters of fact, the execution of the contract in writing between the plaintiff and defendant, repeated tenders of payment or other equivalent by plaintiff under the agreement, and the amount due the defendant under the contract, and as a conclusion of law granted the plaintiff the relief he sought, upon proper conditions. It found against the defendant as to his claims' of abandonment and relinquishment of plaintiff’s right under the contract and as to the improvements made by defendant in reliance thereon. There is no point of law in the case deserving of consideration. The court could have made no other findings of fact upon the evidence. The abandonment, relinquishment, and improvements consisted of unjustified trespasses by the defendant. The defendant’s contentions contain nothing of general interest or importance, and in themselves do not call for discussion.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 N.W. 1150, 96 Minn. 534, 1905 Minn. LEXIS 594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-nelson-minn-1905.