Johnson v. N.C. Department of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Johnson v. N.C. Department of Correction

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission

DecidedAugust 24, 2011

DocketI.C. NO. TA-21341.

StatusPublished

This text of Johnson v. N.C. Department of Correction (Johnson v. N.C. Department of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. N.C. Department of Correction, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

*********** Pursuant to Rule T303 of the Tort Claims Rules of the North Carolina Industrial Commission, "The appellant shall, within 25 days of receipt of the transcript of the record, or receipt of notice that there will be no transcript of the record, file in triplicate with the Industrial Commission, a written statement of the particular grounds for the appeal." Rule T304 provides that, "Failure to file assignments of error may result in the dismissal of the appeal either upon the Motion of the non-appealing party or upon the Full Commission's own Motion." On March 22, 2011, the Industrial Commission Docket Director acknowledged receipt of Plaintiff's notice of appeal and advised Plaintiff that, "Forms T-44, which will be enclosed with the transcript, must be filed in triplicate within 25 days from receipt of the transcript." There is no evidence that Plaintiff did not receive the Docket Director's correspondence of March 22, 2011. The transcript *Page 2 was filed on March 24, 2011. There is no evidence that Plaintiff did not receive the transcript. Plaintiff has not filed a Form T-44 or brief with the Commission.

Pursuant to Rule T304 of the Tort Claims Rules of the North Carolina Industrial Commission, Plaintiff's appeal to the Full Commission is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice due to his failure to file a Form T-44 or brief. No costs are taxed to Plaintiff, who was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis.

This the __ day of August, 2011.

S/___________________ LINDA CHEATHAM COMMISSIONER

CONCURRING:

S/_____________ BERNADINE S. BALLANCE COMMISSIONER

S/_____________ TAMMY R. NANCE COMMISSIONER

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*********** Pursuant to Rule T303 of the Tort Claims Rules of the North Carolina Industrial Commission, "The appellant shall, within 25 days of receipt of the transcript of the record, or receipt of notice that there will be no transcript of the record, file in triplicate with the Industrial Commission, a written statement of the particular grounds for the appeal." Rule T304 provides that, "Failure to file assignments of error may result in the dismissal of the appeal either upon the Motion of the non-appealing party or upon the Full Commission's own Motion." On March 22, 2011, the Industrial Commission Docket Director acknowledged receipt of Plaintiff's notice of appeal and advised Plaintiff that, "Forms T-44, which will be enclosed with the transcript, must be filed in triplicate within 25 days from receipt of the transcript." There is no evidence that Plaintiff did not receive the Docket Director's correspondence of March 22, 2011. The transcript *Page 2 was filed on March 24, 2011. There is no evidence that Plaintiff did not receive the transcript. Plaintiff has not filed a Form T-44 or brief with the Commission.