Johnson v. Natl. Union Fire Ins., Pittsburg, Pa.

Alabama Court of Appeals

Johnson v. Natl. Union Fire Ins., Pittsburg, Pa.

123 So. 278, 23 Ala. App. 254, 1929 Ala. App. LEXIS 197

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 29, 1929

Docket1 Div. 808.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 123 So. 278 (Johnson v. Natl. Union Fire Ins., Pittsburg, Pa.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Natl. Union Fire Ins., Pittsburg, Pa., 123 So. 278, 23 Ala. App. 254, 1929 Ala. App. LEXIS 197 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMEORD, J.

The appellant (plaintiff in the court below) brought suit on a policy of insurance. Demurrer was filed to the complaint. At the time the cause was called for trial, the defendant being called came not, but made default. Judgment was entered nil dicit. Subsequently during the same term of the court the defendant filed its motion for a new trial under sections 9518 and 9521 of the Code of 1923. The trial court entered an order granting the motion and restoring the cause to the docket. Erom this order plaintiff prosecutes this appeal. Motion is here made to dismiss the appeal.

As we see it, the question is settled by the decision in Ex parte Gay, 213 Ala. 5, 104 So. 898, in which it is held that this court has no jurisdiction to entertain an appeal in cases, of this character. If the appellant has a remedy, it is by mandamus.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMEORD, J.

The appellant (plaintiff in the court below) brought suit on a policy of insurance. Demurrer was filed to the complaint. At the time the cause was called for trial, the defendant being called came not, but made default. Judgment was entered nil dicit. Subsequently during the same term of the court the defendant filed its motion for a new trial under sections 9518 and 9521 of the Code of 1923. The trial court entered an order granting the motion and restoring the cause to the docket. Erom this order plaintiff prosecutes this appeal. Motion is here made to dismiss the appeal.

As we see it, the question is settled by the decision in Ex parte Gay, 213 Ala. 5, 104 So. 898, in which it is held that this court has no jurisdiction to entertain an appeal in cases, of this character. If the appellant has a remedy, it is by mandamus.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 So. 278, 23 Ala. App. 254, 1929 Ala. App. LEXIS 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-natl-union-fire-ins-pittsburg-pa-alactapp-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack