Johnson v. Nacino
This text of Johnson v. Nacino (Johnson v. Nacino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-14-0001147 18-MAR-2015 12:01 PM
SCPW-14-0001147
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
FATHER WALTER JOHNSON, Petitioner,
vs.
THE HONORABLE EDWIN C. NACINO, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent Judge,
and
JOHN ROE 2; SOCIETY OF THE PRIESTS OF SAINT SULPICE
A/K/A THE ASSOCIATED SULPICIANS OF THE UNITED STATES, INC.;
CATHOLIC FOREIGN MISSION SOCIETY OF AMERICA, INC.,
AKA MARYKNOLL FATHERS AND BROTHERS; and ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH
IN THE STATE OF HAWAII, Respondents.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
(CIV. NO. 12-1-1637-06)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
OR OTHER APPROPRIATE RELIEF
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Upon consideration of Petitioner Father Walter
Johnson’s petition for a writ of mandamus or other appropriate
relief, filed on October 1, 2014, the documents attached thereto
and submitted in support thereof, and the record, it appears
that, under the specific facts and circumstances of this matter
and the terms of the protective order, Petitioner fails to
demonstrate that disclosure of the requested documents pursuant
to the protective order issued by the Discovery Master violates
article I, section 6 of the Hawai'i Constitution. Petitioner,
therefore, is not entitled to a writ of mandamus. See Kema v.
Gaddis, 91 Hawai'i 200, 204-05, 982 P.2d 334, 338-39 (1999) (a
writ of mandamus is meant to restrain a judge of an inferior
court who has exceeded his or her jurisdiction, has committed a
flagrant and manifest abuse of discretion, or has refused to act
on a subject properly before the court under circumstances in
which he or she has a legal duty to act). Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of
mandamus is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, March 18, 2015.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Johnson v. Nacino, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-nacino-haw-2015.