Johnson v. Morris

21 Ga. 238
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1857
DocketNo. 50
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 21 Ga. 238 (Johnson v. Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Morris, 21 Ga. 238 (Ga. 1857).

Opinion

By the Court.

Lumpkin, J.

delivering the opinion.

It is not pretended that the negro, for whose hire this suit is brought, was originally hired by Johnson of Morris. It is [240]*240insisted however, that under a contract between Jones and Johnson, Johnson was to become paymaster to Morris. Morris contends that the agreement was absolute; Johnson that it was conditional. Let it be either way, it was a parol understanding to pay the debt of another, and therefore void. Let Morris sue Jones, and Jones, Johnson; and if the latter be insolvent, Johnson can be garnisheed.

Was it competent to prove the acknowledgment of Reuben Dean, that he had runaway from Alabama on account of having committed perjury? We are not prepared to say that his testimony could be discredited in this way.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Guy v. Riley
180 S.E. 624 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 Ga. 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-morris-ga-1857.