Johnson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
This text of 271 A.D.2d 890 (Johnson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action to recover a death benefit under a policy of accident insurance. The insured had a toothache and an infected gum. A dentist negligently injected a liquid anesthetic into the gum, ’causing the infection to reach deeper and wider areas. The increased infection was treated medically and surgically, and the patient died. The policy covers death by violent and accidental means, but excludes the risk of death wholly or partly by any kind of infection. An exception to the above exclusion is made in a case where septic infection of and through a visible wound is caused solely by violent and accidental means. Judgment, entered on the direction of a verdict in favor of plaintiff, reversed on the law, with costs, and the complaint dismissed on the law, with costs. The facts are affirmed. Plaintiff’s evidence is uncontradieted. We hold as matter of law that, under the' proof, the death of the insured is excluded as a risk, being one caused by “ any kind of infection ”; and that the case is not within the exception to the exclusion because there was no “ infection of and through a visible wound ” which was caused solely by “ violent and accidental means ”. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Adel and Nolan, JJ., concur; Carswell and Johnston, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm. [187 Misc. 66.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
271 A.D.2d 890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-metropolitan-life-insurance-nyappdiv-1946.