Johnson v. Medford

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. Medford. Read the opinion of the Court — 37 F. App'x 622
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 7, 2002·No. 02-6415·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6415

WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SUE MEDFORD, Nurse Supervisor at Marion Correctional Institution, in her official and individual capacity; SID HARKLEROAD, Superintendent at Marion Correctional Institution, in his official and individual capacity; ANGELA TWITTY, in her official and individual capacity; JANE DOE, in her official and individual capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-1-1-MU)

Submitted: May 30, 2002 Decided: June 7, 2002

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wayne Thomas Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Wayne Thomas Johnson appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001)

complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Medford, No. CA-

02-1-1-MU (W.D.N.C. Feb. 26, 2002). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Medford, (4th Cir. 2002).

Johnson v. Medford (Johnson v. Medford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related