Johnson v. McRoy

Missouri Court of Appeals

Johnson v. McRoy

302 S.W.3d 785, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 137, 2010 WL 431294

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 9, 2010·No. No. WD 70435·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Vincent Johnson appeals the circuit court’s judgment, after a bench trial, in favor of Defendant-Respondent Elmer McRoy on Johnson’s breach of contract claim, arising out of a contract in which McRoy agreed to do plumbing work on a building Johnson was remodeling. Johnson argues that the trial court’s rejection of his breach of contract claim was against the weight of the evidence. " We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum setting [786] forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Vincent Johnson appeals the circuit court’s judgment, after a bench trial, in favor of Defendant-Respondent Elmer McRoy on Johnson’s breach of contract claim, arising out of a contract in which McRoy agreed to do plumbing work on a building Johnson was remodeling. Johnson argues that the trial court’s rejection of his breach of contract claim was against the weight of the evidence. " We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum setting [786] forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Johnson v. McRoy, 302 S.W.3d 785, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 137, 2010 WL 431294 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

302 S.W.3d 785 (Johnson v. McRoy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.