ORDER REGARDING FORM 1099 ISSUING REQUIREMENTS AFTER PAYMENT OF SETTLEMENT
LEO S. PAPAS, United States Magistrate Judge.
BACKGROUND
On July 25, 2007, Plaintiff and Defendant reached an agreement to settle Plaintiffs employment discrimination case. Plaintiff agreed to release all claims against Defendant in exchange for Defendant’s payment of a confidential sum. The parties were instructed to draft a settlement agreement memorializing their agreement. Thereafter, the parties stipulated that the undersigned would have jurisdiction to decide,
inter alia,
all disputes regarding settlement terms arising during the documentation of settlement that could not be resolved by the parties themselves.
The parties negotiated a written settlement agreement but came to an impasse regarding to whom, and in what amount, must Defendant provide Internal Revenue Service (hereinafter “IRS”) information form 1099s (hereinafter “form 1099”).
The Court requested that counsel submit briefs regarding the disputed issues. On August 31, 2007, Plaintiffs counsel
(hereinafter “Attorney”) submitted to the Court a letter brief (hereinafter “Aug. 3 Letter Br.”). On September 5, 2007, Defendant’s counsel submitted to the Court a letter brief (hereinafter “Sept.
5
Letter Br.”). On October 4, 2007, Attorney submitted to the Court a letter brief that responded to Defendant’s Sept. 5 Letter Br. (hereinafter “Oct. 4 Letter Br.”).
Initially, Defendant drafted the settlement agreement to state “Defendant will issue any information statements (e.g., Form 1099) required by law with respect to the payment.” (Sept. 5 Letter Br., Ex. A.) Attorney objected to this language and suggested it be revised to read “Defendant will issue any information statements (e.g. Form 1099) required by law to Johnson’s attorney of record.” (Sept. 5 Letter Br., Ex. B.)
Attorney had originally requested Defendant provide him with a check made payable to both Attorney and Plaintiff, but requested Defendant issue a form 1099 solely to Attorney in the full amount of the settlement payment. Defendant informed Attorney that if Defendant made the settlement check payable to both Attorney and Plaintiff, Defendant would be required to issue form 1099s to both Attorney and Plaintiff. (Sept. 5 Letter Br., Exs. H, I.) Attorney then requested Defendant issue the settlement check solely to Attorney’s client trust account, and again requested Defendant issue a form 1099 solely to Attorney for the full amount of the settlement payment. (Sept. 5 Letter Br., Ex. J.) Defendant informed Attorney that if Defendant were to make the settlement check payable to Attorney’s client trust account, Defendant would continue to be required to issue form 1099s to both Attorney and Plaintiff. (Sept. 5 Letter Br., Ex. K.) Attorney remained steadfast in his position that Defendant should issue only one form 1099 to Attorney for the full amount of the settlement payment. (Sept. 5 Letter Br., Exs. L, O.)
On October 10, 2007, the Court heard arguments regarding to whom, and in what amount, Defendant should provide information statement form 1099s. This Order addresses Defendant’s form 1099 issuing requirements upon payment of a judgment or settlement.
DISCUSSION
1. Issuing Form 1099s
An IRS form 1099 is an informational statement businesses are required to provide to the recipient of a payment in order to report certain transactions to the IRS.
The requirement to issue a form 1099 is mandated by the Internal Revenue Code (hereinafter “I.R.C.”) and associated Treasury Regulations (hereinafter “Treas. Regs.”). Failure to issue a form 1099 may result in penalties under I.R.C. § 6721.
After January 1, 2007, a Defendant engaged in a trade or business who makes a judgment and/or settlement payment over $600 may be required to issue a form 1099 to Plaintiff and/or Plaintiffs Attorney depending on how the payment is made.
Whether or not Defendant must issue a
form 1099 to only Plaintiff, to only Attorney, or to both Plaintiff and Attorney, will depend on the specific circumstances of the payment.
Pursuant to the I.R.C. and Treas. Regs., the Court must engage in a the three step analysis detailed below to determine what, if any, form 1099s Defendant must issue with regard to a judgment or settlement payment. This Order addresses each form of payment that Defendant may make separately, and the resulting form 1099 issuing requirements.
The Court’s Three Step Analysis:
(1) Is Defendant engaged in a trade or business?
(2) Is the judgment or settlement payment gross income to Plaintiff?
(3) How is Defendant paying Plaintiff?
(a) A check made out only to Plaintiff
(b) A check make out only to Attorney
(c) A check made out to Attorney and Plaintiff
(d) Separate checks to Attorney and Plaintiff
(e) A check made out to multiple Attorneys
(f) Another method of payment such as cash, wire transfer or electronic transfer
(1) Step One: Is Defendant engaged in a trade or business?
The Court begins by determining whether or not the Defendant is a person “engaged in a trade or business and making payment in the course of such trade or business.”
If the answer is yes, that
Defendant is required to file form 1099s according to the instructions in the I.R.C. and Treas. Regs, as explained below. If Defendant is not engaged in a trade or business, then Defendant is not required to issue form 1099s.
The Treas. Regs, explain that Defendant is engaged in a trade or business if Defendant performs any activity for gain or profit or is a non-profit organization under I.R.C. §§ 401(a), 501(c), 501(d) or 521.
Defendant is not engaged in a trade or business if Defendant is merely an individual or is acting in his or her individual capacity.
If the court finds Defendant is engaged in a trade or business, the Court moves to step two in its analysis to determine whether or not the payment is gross income to Plaintiff.
(2) Step Two: Is the judgment or settlement payment gross income to Plaintiff?
The IRS broadly defines what constitutes gross income and allows for few exceptions. Generally, income is “all income from whatever source derived.”
Payments of a judgment or settlement will likely fall within the broad scope of taxable income. However, a few exceptions exist.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
ORDER REGARDING FORM 1099 ISSUING REQUIREMENTS AFTER PAYMENT OF SETTLEMENT
LEO S. PAPAS, United States Magistrate Judge.
BACKGROUND
On July 25, 2007, Plaintiff and Defendant reached an agreement to settle Plaintiffs employment discrimination case. Plaintiff agreed to release all claims against Defendant in exchange for Defendant’s payment of a confidential sum. The parties were instructed to draft a settlement agreement memorializing their agreement. Thereafter, the parties stipulated that the undersigned would have jurisdiction to decide,
inter alia,
all disputes regarding settlement terms arising during the documentation of settlement that could not be resolved by the parties themselves.
The parties negotiated a written settlement agreement but came to an impasse regarding to whom, and in what amount, must Defendant provide Internal Revenue Service (hereinafter “IRS”) information form 1099s (hereinafter “form 1099”).
The Court requested that counsel submit briefs regarding the disputed issues. On August 31, 2007, Plaintiffs counsel
(hereinafter “Attorney”) submitted to the Court a letter brief (hereinafter “Aug. 3 Letter Br.”). On September 5, 2007, Defendant’s counsel submitted to the Court a letter brief (hereinafter “Sept.
5
Letter Br.”). On October 4, 2007, Attorney submitted to the Court a letter brief that responded to Defendant’s Sept. 5 Letter Br. (hereinafter “Oct. 4 Letter Br.”).
Initially, Defendant drafted the settlement agreement to state “Defendant will issue any information statements (e.g., Form 1099) required by law with respect to the payment.” (Sept. 5 Letter Br., Ex. A.) Attorney objected to this language and suggested it be revised to read “Defendant will issue any information statements (e.g. Form 1099) required by law to Johnson’s attorney of record.” (Sept. 5 Letter Br., Ex. B.)
Attorney had originally requested Defendant provide him with a check made payable to both Attorney and Plaintiff, but requested Defendant issue a form 1099 solely to Attorney in the full amount of the settlement payment. Defendant informed Attorney that if Defendant made the settlement check payable to both Attorney and Plaintiff, Defendant would be required to issue form 1099s to both Attorney and Plaintiff. (Sept. 5 Letter Br., Exs. H, I.) Attorney then requested Defendant issue the settlement check solely to Attorney’s client trust account, and again requested Defendant issue a form 1099 solely to Attorney for the full amount of the settlement payment. (Sept. 5 Letter Br., Ex. J.) Defendant informed Attorney that if Defendant were to make the settlement check payable to Attorney’s client trust account, Defendant would continue to be required to issue form 1099s to both Attorney and Plaintiff. (Sept. 5 Letter Br., Ex. K.) Attorney remained steadfast in his position that Defendant should issue only one form 1099 to Attorney for the full amount of the settlement payment. (Sept. 5 Letter Br., Exs. L, O.)
On October 10, 2007, the Court heard arguments regarding to whom, and in what amount, Defendant should provide information statement form 1099s. This Order addresses Defendant’s form 1099 issuing requirements upon payment of a judgment or settlement.
DISCUSSION
1. Issuing Form 1099s
An IRS form 1099 is an informational statement businesses are required to provide to the recipient of a payment in order to report certain transactions to the IRS.
The requirement to issue a form 1099 is mandated by the Internal Revenue Code (hereinafter “I.R.C.”) and associated Treasury Regulations (hereinafter “Treas. Regs.”). Failure to issue a form 1099 may result in penalties under I.R.C. § 6721.
After January 1, 2007, a Defendant engaged in a trade or business who makes a judgment and/or settlement payment over $600 may be required to issue a form 1099 to Plaintiff and/or Plaintiffs Attorney depending on how the payment is made.
Whether or not Defendant must issue a
form 1099 to only Plaintiff, to only Attorney, or to both Plaintiff and Attorney, will depend on the specific circumstances of the payment.
Pursuant to the I.R.C. and Treas. Regs., the Court must engage in a the three step analysis detailed below to determine what, if any, form 1099s Defendant must issue with regard to a judgment or settlement payment. This Order addresses each form of payment that Defendant may make separately, and the resulting form 1099 issuing requirements.
The Court’s Three Step Analysis:
(1) Is Defendant engaged in a trade or business?
(2) Is the judgment or settlement payment gross income to Plaintiff?
(3) How is Defendant paying Plaintiff?
(a) A check made out only to Plaintiff
(b) A check make out only to Attorney
(c) A check made out to Attorney and Plaintiff
(d) Separate checks to Attorney and Plaintiff
(e) A check made out to multiple Attorneys
(f) Another method of payment such as cash, wire transfer or electronic transfer
(1) Step One: Is Defendant engaged in a trade or business?
The Court begins by determining whether or not the Defendant is a person “engaged in a trade or business and making payment in the course of such trade or business.”
If the answer is yes, that
Defendant is required to file form 1099s according to the instructions in the I.R.C. and Treas. Regs, as explained below. If Defendant is not engaged in a trade or business, then Defendant is not required to issue form 1099s.
The Treas. Regs, explain that Defendant is engaged in a trade or business if Defendant performs any activity for gain or profit or is a non-profit organization under I.R.C. §§ 401(a), 501(c), 501(d) or 521.
Defendant is not engaged in a trade or business if Defendant is merely an individual or is acting in his or her individual capacity.
If the court finds Defendant is engaged in a trade or business, the Court moves to step two in its analysis to determine whether or not the payment is gross income to Plaintiff.
(2) Step Two: Is the judgment or settlement payment gross income to Plaintiff?
The IRS broadly defines what constitutes gross income and allows for few exceptions. Generally, income is “all income from whatever source derived.”
Payments of a judgment or settlement will likely fall within the broad scope of taxable income. However, a few exceptions exist.
Since the definition of gross income is very broad and the exceptions are limited, the Court assumes a judgment or settlement payment is gross income to Plaintiff unless Plaintiff can point to the I.R.C. or Treas. Regs, to demonstrate otherwise.
If the judgment or settlement payment is not gross income to Plaintiff, Defendant is not required to issue a form 1099 to Plaintiff.
However, Defendant continues
to be required to issue a form 1099 to Attorney for payments over $600.
If the judgment or settlement payment is gross income to Plaintiff, or if Defendant is required to issue a form 1099 to Attorney, the Court should move to step three in its analysis to determine Defendant’s form 1099 issuing requirements based on the circumstances of payment.
(3) Step Three: How is Defendant paying Plaintiff?
Defendant’s form 1099 issuing requirements may differ depending on whether Defendant pays the judgment or settlement with a check made out only to Plaintiff, a check made out only to Attorney, a check made out to Attorney and Plaintiff, separate checks to Attorney and Plaintiff, a check made out to multiple Attorneys, or using another method of payment such as cash, wire transfer or electronic transfer. An explanation of Defendant’s form 1099 issuing requirements for each of the these factual situations is stated below.
(a) A check made out only to Plaintiff
If some or all of the judgment or settlement payment is includable in Plaintiffs gross income and Defendant writes a check payable to only Plaintiff, Defendant is required to provide only Plaintiff with a form 1099.
Here, the key question is whether or not Attorney has the right to negotiate the check. If Attorney is not listed as a payee on the check and does not have the right to negotiate the check, Defendant is not required to provide Attorney with a form 1099.
It is important to note that if Attorney’s client trust account is listed as a payee on the check, the check is not considered to be made out only to Plaintiff and Defendant will be required to provide a form 1099 to Attorney as well as Plaintiff.
If the check is made payable to only Plaintiff, but the check is delivered to Attorney because it is addressed to Plaintiff “in care of’ or “c/o” Attorney, Defendant is not required to provide a form 1099 to Attorney, but is required to provide a form 1099 to Plaintiff.
(b) A check make out only to Attorney
If some or all of the judgment or settlement payment is includable in Plaintiffs gross income, and the check is made pay
able to only Attorney,. Defendant is required to provide a form 1099 to both Attorney and Plaintiff.
This is because Defendant has separate obligations under the I.R.C. to provide Attorney and Plaintiff with form 1099s.
Treas. Reg. § 1.6045-5 states that Defendant must provide Attorney with a form 1099 for payments over $600 whether or not the attorney’s services were performed for Defendant and whether or not Defendant is required to provide additional form 1099s.
Treas. Reg. § 1.6041-1 states that Defendant is also required to provide Plaintiff with a form 1099 for payments made over $600 if the payment is considered gross income to Plaintiff.
Therefore, when a check is made out to only Attorney and the payment is considered gross income to Plaintiff, Defendant is required to provide form 1099s to Attorney and Plaintiff.
(c) A check made out to Attorney and Plaintiff
If some or all of the judgment or settlement payment is includable in Plaintiffs gross income and the check is made payable to both Attorney and Plaintiff, Defendant is required to provide form 1099s to both Attorney and Plaintiff. This is because Defendant has separate obligations under the I.R.C. and Treas. Regs, to provide Attorney and Plaintiff with form 1099s.
Additionally, a check made payable to Attorney’s client trust account is considered to be made payable to Attorney.
Therefore, if a check is made pay
able to both Attorney’s client trust account and Plaintiff, Defendant will be required to provide form 1099s to both Attorney and Plaintiff.
(d) Separate checks to Attorney and Plaintiff
If separate checks are made out to Attorney and to Plaintiff that are payable to only Attorney and to only Plaintiff respectively, Defendant is required to provide Attorney with a form 1099 in the amount of the check made out to Attorney and provide Plaintiff with a form 1099 for the total amount of the judgment or settlement payment that is includable in Plaintiffs gross income (including the payment to Attorney).
Therefore, if a judgment or settlement is entered against Defendant for $300,000, and Attorney and Plaintiff request that Defendant provide Attorney with a check payable to only Attorney for $100,000 for Attorney’s fees and provide Plaintiff with a check payable to only Plaintiff for $200,000, Defendant must provide Attorney with a form 1099 in the amount of $100,000 and provide Plaintiff with a form 1099 in the amount of $300,000.
(e) A check made out to multiple Attorneys
If multiple attorneys are- listed as payees on the check, Defendant must provide a form 1099 to the payee attorney to which the check is delivered.
If multiple attorneys are listed as payees on the check, but the check is delivered to someone who is not a payee, Defendant must provide a
form 1099 to the first named payee Attorney on the check.
(f) Another method of payment such as cash, wire transfer or electronic transfer
The rules regarding form 1099s apply to all settlement or judgment payments including payments made with cash, wire transfer, electronic transfer or any other form of payment.
Payments made by alternative methods should be treated as if they were made by check and follow the same rules as discussed above.
II. Parties’ Settlement
The parties do not dispute that Defendant is engaged in a trade or business and will be making the settlement payment in the course of such trade or business. Also, the parties do not dispute that the settlement payment constitutes gross income to Plaintiff.
In light of the foregoing, Attorney requested additional time to confer with his client to determine Plaintiffs preferred method of payment. Once Plaintiff has decided exactly how she would prefer Defendant to pay the settlement amount, Attorney is instructed to forward Plaintiffs request to Defendant. Defendant will then issue any and all form 1099s required by law with respect to the payment.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED Plaintiffs Attorney must confer with his client and inform Defendant of Plaintiffs preferred method of payment by October 24, 2007. Defendant will then issue any and all form 1099s required by law with respect to the settlement payment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.