Johnson v. Long

Missouri Court of Appeals

Johnson v. Long

234 S.W.3d 626, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1374, 2007 WL 2914645

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 9, 2007·No. WD 67395·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lamar Johnson appeals the dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted of his petition seeking declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief from the Missouri Attorney General and three employees of the Missouri De *627 partment of Corrections. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the ruling is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lamar Johnson appeals the dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted of his petition seeking declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief from the Missouri Attorney General and three employees of the Missouri De *627 partment of Corrections. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the ruling is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Johnson v. Long, 234 S.W.3d 626, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1374, 2007 WL 2914645 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

234 S.W.3d 626 (Johnson v. Long) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related