Johnson v. Long

234 S.W.3d 626, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1374, 2007 WL 2914645
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 9, 2007
DocketWD 67395
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 234 S.W.3d 626 (Johnson v. Long) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Long, 234 S.W.3d 626, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1374, 2007 WL 2914645 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lamar Johnson appeals the dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted of his petition seeking declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief from the Missouri Attorney General and three employees of the Missouri De *627 partment of Corrections. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the ruling is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Richardson
234 S.W.3d 626 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
234 S.W.3d 626, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1374, 2007 WL 2914645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-long-moctapp-2007.