Johnson v. Loftin

Eighth Circuit

Johnson v. Loftin

23 F. App'x 624

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided January 2, 2002·No. No. 01-2332·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Clyde Johnson appeals from the district court’s¹ 28 U.S.C. § 1915A dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Having carefully reviewed the record, see Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1999) (per curiam) (de novo review), we agree with the district court that dismissal was warranted. See City of Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378, 385, 109 S.Ct. 1197, 103 L.Ed.2d 412 (1989); Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312, 325, 102 S.Ct. 445, 70 L.Ed.2d 509 (1981).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Clyde Johnson appeals from the district court’s¹ 28 U.S.C. § 1915A dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Having carefully reviewed the record, see Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1999) (per curiam) (de novo review), we agree with the district court that dismissal was warranted. See City of Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378, 385, 109 S.Ct. 1197, 103 L.Ed.2d 412 (1989); Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312, 325, 102 S.Ct. 445, 70 L.Ed.2d 509 (1981).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

Footnotes

Johnson v. Loftin, 23 F. App'x 624 (8th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

23 F. App'x 624 (Johnson v. Loftin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related