Johnson v. Lisbon Falls Baptist Church
This text of Johnson v. Lisbon Falls Baptist Church (Johnson v. Lisbon Falls Baptist Church) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT ANDROSCOGGIN, ss. CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV-18-141 NORMAN JOHNSON, JR., ) ) Plaintiff ) ) ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S v. ) MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION ) LISBON FALLS BAPTIST CHURCH, ) ) Defendant. )
Before the Court is Lisbon Fall Baptist Church's ("LFBC") motion for
reconsideration. LFBC specifically asks the Court to reconsider its denial of LFBC's
motion for summary judgment on Count I of Mr. Johnson's complaint regarding owner
or occupier liability. For the following reasons, the motion is denied.
Motions for reconsideration may only be utilized "to bring to the court's attention
an error, omission or new material that could not previously have been presented." M.R.
Civ. P. 7(b)(5). "Rule 7(b )(5) is intended to deter disappointed litigants from seeking 'to
reargue points that were or could have been presented to the court on the underlying
motion."' Shaw v. Shaw, 2003 ME 153, 'l[ 8, 839 A.2d 714 (citing M.R. Civ. P. 7(b)(5)
advisory committee's note to 2000 amend.). A motion for reconsideration need not be
granted "unless it is reasonably clear that prejudicial error has been committed or that
substantial justice has not been done.... The burden of showing harmful error rests on
the [moving] party." Cates v. Farrington, 423 A.2d 539, 541 (Me. 1980).
LFBC's motion offers no new material that was not or could not previously have
been presented, but merely reasserts the arguments made in its motion for summary
judgment, and the Court is not persuaded that it was error to allow Mr. Johnson to
proceed on Count I of his complaint. The record is not without evidence that could
1 of 2 support a finding in favor of Mr. Johnson on Count I. LFBC may raise its arguments again
before the jury.
For the foregoing reasons, Defendant Lisbon Falls Baptist Church's Motion for
Reconsideration is DENIED.
The Clerk is directed to incorporate this Order into the docket by reference
pursuant to Maine Rule of Civil Procedure 79(a).
Dated: --W+-~l.u..s,.J~'+--l-/;.,.__9_ Mary Main
2 of 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Johnson v. Lisbon Falls Baptist Church, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-lisbon-falls-baptist-church-mesuperct-2019.