Johnson v. Knight Transportation, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided March 10, 2022·No. 1:18-cv-01674·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SORYA JOHNSON, ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-01674-BAK (SAB) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER CLOSING THE CASE 13 v. (Doc. 67) 14 || KNIGHT TRANSPORTATION, INC., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 ) 17 The parties have stipulated to the action being dismissed in its entirety without prejudice. 18 || (Doc. 67). The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective 19 ||immediately without further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th 20 || Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. Al (ee 23 |! ated: _March 10, 2022 OF 24 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Knight Transportation, Inc., (E.D. Cal. 2022).

Johnson v. Knight Transportation, Inc. (Johnson v. Knight Transportation, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)