Johnson v. King

Fourth Circuit

Johnson v. King

6 F. App'x 168

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 27, 2001·No. Nos. 00-2362, 00-7610·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Johnson, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his post-judgment motions filed in his civil actions. We have reviewed the records and the district court’s ^opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals as frivolous on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. King, Nos. CA-97-[169]*1691532; CA-98-1368 A (E.D.Va. Oct. 3, 2000; Oct. 25, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Johnson, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his post-judgment motions filed in his civil actions. We have reviewed the records and the district court’s ^opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals as frivolous on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. King, Nos. CA-97-[169]*1691532; CA-98-1368 A (E.D.Va. Oct. 3, 2000; Oct. 25, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Johnson v. King, 6 F. App'x 168 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

6 F. App'x 168 (Johnson v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related