Johnson v. Kilgore

39 Ind. 147
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1872·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Downey, J.

Complaint by the appellee against the appellant, as follows: “Joseph Kilgore complains of Jesse Johnson, defendant, and says-that .said defendant is indebted to him in the sum of six hundred dollars for work done and labor performed and materials furnished, a bill of particulars of which is filed herewith. Wherefore plaintiff demands judgment for seven hundred dollars and other proper relief.” It has the proper caption, is signed by counsel, and accompanied with a bill of particulars.

The only question presented to this court is as to the sufficiency of the complaint. It is objected that it is bad, because it does not aver that the debt is due and unpaid. Both of these, we presume, are embraced in the allegation that “ the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff.” The complaint is substantially according to the form published in the statute, 2 G. & H. 376, No. 11, and these-forms are expressly declared to be sufficient. 2 G. & H. 373, sec. 1.

y. Brownlee and H. Brownlee, for appellant. I. Van Devanter and y F. McDowell, for appellee.

The judgment is affirmed, with ten per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Kilgore, 39 Ind. 147 (Ind. 1872).

39 Ind. 147 (Johnson v. Kilgore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goben v. Home Building, Loan Fund & Savings Ass'n
83 N.E. 523 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1908)
Jaqua v. Shewalter
36 N.E. 173 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1893)
Busta v. Wardall
52 N.W. 418 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1892)
Stanley v. Montgomery
26 N.E. 213 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1885)
Hartlep v. Cole
94 Ind. 513 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1884)
Humphrey v. Fair
79 Ind. 410 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)
Tyler v. Kent
52 Ind. 583 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1876)