Johnson v. Kemper Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Johnson v. Kemper Corp.

873 S.W.2d 279, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 403, 1994 WL 67134

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 8, 1994·No. No. 64223·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment in a court-tried case denying them recovery for termite damage under their homeowner’s policy. No error of law appears, the judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a statement setting forth the basis of our decision.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment in a court-tried case denying them recovery for termite damage under their homeowner’s policy. No error of law appears, the judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a statement setting forth the basis of our decision.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Johnson v. Kemper Corp., 873 S.W.2d 279, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 403, 1994 WL 67134 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

873 S.W.2d 279 (Johnson v. Kemper Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.