Johnson v. Kelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Johnson v. Kelly

147 A.D.2d 987, 538 N.Y.S.2d 670, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12232

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 3, 1989

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 147 A.D.2d 987 (Johnson v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Kelly, 147 A.D.2d 987, 538 N.Y.S.2d 670, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12232 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

— Motion to vacate abandonment and dismissal of transferred proceeding granted and clerk directed to accept for filing briefs and appendices. Memorandum: Continued reliance upon the heavy workload of the Legal Aid Bureau as an excuse for the delay in perfecting the proceeding would make 22 NYCRR 1000.3 (b) (2) (i) meaningless. Therefore, we note that, in the future, we may not consider this a sufficient excuse to justify such a long delay in perfecting the proceeding, especially when no motion is made prior to the expiration of the nine-month period for an extension of time to perfect the proceeding. Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Motion to vacate abandonment and dismissal of transferred proceeding granted and clerk directed to accept for filing briefs and appendices. Memorandum: Continued reliance upon the heavy workload of the Legal Aid Bureau as an excuse for the delay in perfecting the proceeding would make 22 NYCRR 1000.3 (b) (2) (i) meaningless. Therefore, we note that, in the future, we may not consider this a sufficient excuse to justify such a long delay in perfecting the proceeding, especially when no motion is made prior to the expiration of the nine-month period for an extension of time to perfect the proceeding. Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 A.D.2d 987, 538 N.Y.S.2d 670, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-kelly-nyappdiv-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack