Johnson v. Keith Hawthorne Hyundai
This text of 665 F. App'x 310 (Johnson v. Keith Hawthorne Hyundai) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Raymond A. Johnson appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaint, ordering him to pay monetary sanctions, and imposing a prefiling injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Keith Hawthorne Hyundai, No, 3:15-cv-00148-RJC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 2016 & June 27, 2016). We deny Johnson’s motions to recuse opposing counsel and for sanctions, and we deny the Appellees’ motion for sanctions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
665 F. App'x 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-keith-hawthorne-hyundai-ca4-2016.